Darwin's theory of evolution - the case of the Miller-Urey experiment
One advantage of the theory of evolution has been an experiment called the experience of the Miller / Urey. This experiment uses a series of chemicals such as ammonia and hydrogen. Electric charge of these chemicals has (needed to build a protein molecule) produced two of the simplest amino acids.
Textbooks
This test has the promise of hope that maybe how life arose. The scientific experiment gained public attention because it is much given to the validitythe idea that life came from non-living (inorganic) chemicals.
That hope was destroyed after a "period some major problems.:
A fact that oxygen is not included in the trial. Oxygen is necessary for almost all forms of life. But that would (oxygen leads to an explosion) to destroy the experience of oxygen. Oxygen, even if it is necessary for almost all forms of life is also the possibility of life in the 'Origin of Life. " This is exactly the same ingredientis for life would be necessary to eliminate all forms of life in the early stages.
In addition to this, others were constructed as follows:
1st There is no evidence that the atmosphere near the same kind of atmosphere that was used in the experiment. It has never existed on earth.
2nd If it would ever be lethal to most life forms on Earth
3rd The chemicals used in the experiment would provide the possibility of life.
This experienceproved to be a dead end for those who "life principle" of evolution.
It is much worse.
Even evolutionists generally accepted that the experience of Miller / Urey nothing to support his theory. But many teachers, textbooks and even teachers to use this experience to support the theory of evolution.
So even if this experience is not valid (for use in support of evolutionary theory), know that children in the United States that this is a valid support forTheory. The textbooks used in our country, even with the support to the theory. The experience was however rejected by evolutionists for decades
This means that our young people and even children are the "facts" completely contradict science (sadly are dozens of other examples of this type still in textbooks) is taught.
Yes, the students Darwin's theory of evolution by dozens of "facts" that have been wrong for decades have demonstrated, taughtfirst. It is time to replace that kind of information in textbooks about the truth? Or should we allow it, these books still include outdated (and wrong) material?
Darwin's theory of evolution - the case of the Miller-Urey experiment
Visit : Buildings across Time An Introduction to World Architecture
